PNG vs JPG vs WebP vs AVIF: Which Format Should You Use?
There is no universally best image format: photographs, interface graphics, archives, and web pages have different requirements.
Read guide →Re-encode JPEG images at a chosen quality, or select another web-friendly output format, using local browser processing.
Drop image(s) here or click to browse
Editor & live preview appear below once you add an image.
Reviewed 2026-07-10
JPEG compression trades some image detail for a smaller representation. The quality control ranges from 10% to 100%, but its value is an encoder setting rather than a promise of a particular file size.
Images are decoded and encoded in the current browser tab. Large batches can consume substantial memory because compressed JPEG bytes expand to full RGBA pixel buffers while being processed.
No. Standard JPEG encoding remains lossy at the highest setting, and the number is not comparable across all encoders.
The tool does not target an exact byte size. Try a representative quality, check the resulting size, and adjust; resizing first may be more effective when dimensions are unnecessarily large.
The implementation decodes the image to pixels and creates a new file without copying the source EXIF, IPTC, or XMP blocks. Use a metadata viewer if the absence of a specific field is important.
There is no universally best image format: photographs, interface graphics, archives, and web pages have different requirements.
Read guide →The best web-image optimisation combines right-sized pixels with a suitable format and a quality setting tested on real content.
Read guide →A 1200 × 630 Open Graph image is a strong link-preview baseline, but feeds, stories, and platform crops still need dedicated checks.
Read guide →